This post updates the article posted on July 23, 2014. To view the earlier post, click here. On November 13, 2014, the Florida Supreme Court answered the following certified question of great public importance in the negative: “In a civil appeal, shall error be held harmless where it is more likely than not that … Continue Reading
On October 6, 2014, the Florida Supreme Court heard oral argument in a case involving whether a public school owes a duty to maintain, make available, and use an automated external defibrillator (AED) on a student athlete who collapses during a school-sanctioned athletic competition. See Limones v. School Board of Lee County, No. SC13-932. The … Continue Reading
The Florida Supreme Court has accepted for review a First District decision holding that Florida’s state insurer of last resort, Citizens Property Insurance Corporation, is not immune from a statutory bad faith failure to settle claim. See Citizens Prop. Ins. Corp. v. Perdido Sun Condo. Ass’n, No. SC14-185. To view the First District’s opinion, click … Continue Reading
VERDICT FORM We, the jury, return the following verdict: 1. Did Defendants place the product on the market with a design defect, which was a legal cause of the decedent’s death? YES _______ NO X 2. Was there negligence on the part of Defendants which was a legal cause of decedent’s … Continue Reading
On June 20, 2014, the Florida Supreme Court accepted review of a Fifth District decision that certified the following question of great public importance: Is an oral agreement to play the lottery and split the proceeds in the event a winning ticket is purchased unenforceable under the statute of frauds when: there is … Continue Reading
On April 8, 2014, the Florida Supreme Court heard oral arguments in an asbestos case concerning the liability of a defendant who has sold a component part to a manufacturer who then incorporates the part into its own products. See Aubin v. Union Carbide Corp., No. SC12-2075. On review was a decision from the … Continue Reading
On June 20, 2012, the Florida Supreme Court accepted review of a Fourth District Court of Appeal case that certified the following question of great public importance: “In a civil appeal, shall error be held harmless where it is more likely than not that the error did not contribute to the judgment?” See Special … Continue Reading
On June 12, 2014, the Florida Supreme Court decided two cases that involved whether municipal ordinances imposing penalties for red light violations detected by devices using cameras were invalid because they were preempted by state law. See Mason v. City of Aventura, No. SC12-644; City of Orlando v. Udowychenko, No. SC12-1471. At issue in the cases was … Continue Reading
On June 19, 2014, the Florida Supreme Court amended the Code of Judicial Conduct and six rules of procedure relating to senior judges who also serve as mediators. To view the opinion click here. Senior judges were first authorized to perform dual service when a new Code of Judicial Conduct was adopted in 1994. … Continue Reading
In the first civil appellate case in Florida to address the newly adopted Daubert standard for the admissibility of expert testimony, Florida’s Third District Court of Appeal held that the standard applies retrospectively and, unlike the former Frye test, prohibits “pure opinion” testimony. See Perez v. Bell South Telecommunications, Inc., 39 Fla. L. Weekly … Continue Reading
On April 17, 2014, the Florida Supreme Court resolved a certified conflict between two of Florida’s district courts of appeal, to hold that the Florida Civil Rights Act (FCRA) prohibits pregnancy discrimination. To read the full opinion click here. In so doing, the supreme court quashed the Third District’s decision in Delva v. Continental … Continue Reading
On March 27, 2014, the Florida Supreme Court reversed the Third District Court of Appeal’s decision in Reider v. Dorsey, 98 So. 3d 1223 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012), and ruled that a person in an altercation with another person owes that other person a duty of care when he blocks his means of escape, allowing … Continue Reading
On March 13, 2014, the Florida Supreme Court, in a 5-2 ruling, issued its long-awaited opinion following review of the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeal’s decision in Estate of McCall v. United States, 642 F.3d 944 (11th Cir. 2011), and answered the following rephrased certified question in the affirmative: Does the statutory cap on wrongful … Continue Reading
On February 6, 2014, the Florida Supreme Court took a liberal view of self-insured retentions (SIRs) and held that an insured can apply indemnification payments from a third party to satisfy its SIR under a general liability policy. See Intervest Constr. of Jax, Inc. v. Gen. Fid. Ins. Co., 39 Fla. L. Weekly S75, … Continue Reading
The Florida Supreme Court has adopted various amendments to the rules of civil procedure that became effective on January 1, 2014. To see all of the redlined changes and to read the decision of the Court adopting these changes, please click here. The significant changes are highlighted below. Deadline Changes The amendments made noteworthy … Continue Reading
On January 30, 2014, the Florida Supreme Court concluded its review of Cedars Healthcare Group, Ltd. v. Ampuero-Martinez, 88 So. 3d 190 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000), (Case Nos. SC11-2208 and SC11-2336), by quashing the Third District’s decision and remanding the case for reconsideration by the Third District pursuant to Florida Hospital Waterman, Inc. v. Buster, … Continue Reading
On January 3, 2014, Florida’s Second District Court of Appeal held, in a case of first impression, that a medical malpractice plaintiff’s direct notice to a medical provider of its intent to sue would also operate as notice to a physician who was an independent contractor of the medical provider. To read the full opinion … Continue Reading
On December 13, 2013, the Florida Supreme Court decided that Florida legislators and legislative staff members can be forced to give deposition testimony and produce documents relating to legislation establishing new congressional districts. See Fla. House of Representatives v. League of Women Voters of Fla.; Romo v. Fla. House of Representatives, Nos. SC13-949 & SC13-951. … Continue Reading
On November 5, 2013, the Florida Supreme Court heard oral argument in a case examining whether a release clearly and unambiguously releases the defendant from liability for a plaintiff’s physical injuries when the release does not expressly reference the defendant’s negligence. See Sanislo v. Give Kids The World, Inc., 98 So. 3d 759 (Fla. 5th … Continue Reading
On October 24, 2013, the Florida Supreme Court reinstated a $1.2 million final judgment awarded to a prospective client of a personal injury law firm who sat in a chair that collapsed during a consultation at the firm. See Friedrich v. Fetterman & Assocs., P.A., No. SC11-2188, 2013 WL 5745617 (Fla. Oct. 24, 2013) … Continue Reading
On October 15, 2013, the Florida Supreme Court accepted review of a case to decide whether the retroactive application of the cap on noneconomic damages for certain medical malpractice cases found in section 766.118, Florida Statutes is constitutional. See Weingrad v Miles, 29 So. 3d 406 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010). In the trial … Continue Reading
On August 2, 2013, the Florida Supreme Court accepted review of a case to examine the issue of proximate cause in a negligent security case. See Sanders v. ERP Operating Ltd. Partnership, 96 So. 3d 929 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012) (No.SC12-2416).Two young adults moved into an apartment complex marketed as a “gated community.” Water … Continue Reading
The Florida Supreme Court has accepted review of the Third District’s decision in Ampuero-Martinez v. Cedars Healthcare Group, 88 So. 3d 190 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000), (Case Nos. SC11-2208 and SC11-2336), which will decide when the discovery of records of adverse medical incidents may extend to patients other than a plaintiff. Background The right to … Continue Reading
On June 3, 2013, the Florida Supreme Court accepted review of a medical malpractice case to address the issue of whether it is impermissible burden shifting for a defendant-doctor to argue that the plaintiff failed to present testimony from another doctor that he or she would have done anything differently than the defendant-doctor. See Saunders … Continue Reading